Parliament is not usually the stage for design debates. Tax and trade dominate the agenda. One late night in Westminster, MPs were talking about light. Ms Qureshi, stood with conviction. Her message was clear: hand-bent glass filled with noble gas is artistry. She criticised the flood of LED strips, saying they undermine public trust. Only gas-filled tubes deserve the title. Chris McDonald, MP for Stockton North, sharing his own commissioning of neon art in Teesside. Cross-party nodding followed.

Numbers framed the urgency. The UK now counts fewer than thirty artisans. The pipeline of skills has closed. Without action, the tradition could vanish. Ideas were floated for a protection act, like Cornish pasties. Preserve authenticity. Support also came from Jim Shannon, DUP, bringing a commercial lens. Neon remains a growth sector. His point: this is not nostalgia but business. Closing remarks came from Chris Bryant, Minister for Creative Industries.

He played with glow metaphors, lightening the mood. Yet beyond the humour, he acknowledged the case. He listed Britain’s neon landmarks: Piccadilly Circus billboards. He argued neon can outlast LEDs. What is at stake? The answer is authenticity. Craft is undermined. That diminishes value. A question of honest labelling. If Scotch must come from Scotland, then craft deserves recognition. This was about culture.

Do we trade individuality for convenience? Our position is clear: real neon matters. So yes, Parliament discussed neon. The protection remains a proposal. But the case is stronger than ever. If MPs can recognise craft, neon lights so can homeowners. Look past cheap imitations. Keep the glow alive.

For more info regarding LIT Labs have a look at our own internet site.

• 글쓰기

• 수정
• 삭제
• 목록