MPs Argue Over Real vs Fake Neon
페이지 정보
작성자 Lila 작성일25-11-14 13:23 조회70회 댓글0건관련링크
본문
Few times in history have we heard the words neon sign echo inside the hallowed halls of Westminster. You expect tax codes and foreign policy, certainly not a row over what counts as real neon. But on a unexpected Commons session, Britain’s lawmakers did just that. the formidable Ms Qureshi rose to defend neon’s honour. Her pitch was sharp: authentic neon is heritage, and cheap LED impostors are strangling it. She reminded the chamber: if it isn’t glass bent by hand and filled with noble gas, it isn’t neon.
another Labour MP chimed in sharing his own neon commission. Even the sceptics were glowing. Facts carried the weight. From hundreds of artisans, barely two dozen survive. No apprentices are being trained. Qureshi called for a Neon Protection Act. From Strangford, Jim Shannon rose. He brought the numbers, saying the global neon market could hit $3.3bn by 2031. Translation: this isn’t nostalgia, it’s business. The government’s Chris Bryant wrapped up. He couldn’t resist glowing wordplay, earning heckles and laughter.
But beneath the jokes was recognition. He reminded MPs of Britain’s glow: the riot of God’s Own Junkyard. He said neon’s eco record is unfairly maligned. So why the debate? Because consumers are duped daily. That wipes out heritage. Think Champagne. If labels are protected in food, then neon deserves truth in labelling. The night was more than politics. Do we trade heritage for LED strips? We’re biased but right: plastic impostors don’t cut it.
Parliament had its glow-up. It’s still early days, best neon lights but the fight has begun. If they can debate glow in Westminster, you can light up your bar. Ditch the pretenders. Support the craft.
In case you loved this informative article and you want to receive more information regarding LIT Labs i implore you to visit our site.
댓글목록
등록된 댓글이 없습니다.
