British MPs seldom discuss aesthetics. Policy, economics, foreign affairs. On a spring evening this year, the subject was neon. Ms Qureshi, brought heritage into the chamber. Her message was direct: hand-bent glass filled with noble gas is artistry. She criticised the flood of LED strips, noting they erase tradition. Marketing should not blur the definition. Chris McDonald added his support, speaking of local artists. There was broad recognition.

Numbers framed the urgency. From hundreds, the number has fallen to a few dozen. No new entrants are learning. Without action, a century-old craft may die. Ideas were floated for a protection act, like Cornish pasties. Defend the craft. Support also came from Jim Shannon, DUP, bringing a commercial lens. Reports show 7.5% annual growth. His point: this is not nostalgia but business. Closing remarks came from Chris Bryant, Minister for Creative Industries.

He teased the chamber with jokes, lightening the mood. Yet beneath the levity, he recognised the seriousness. He listed Britain’s neon landmarks: Tracey Emin’s installations. He argued neon can outlast LEDs. Why the debate? The risk is confusion. Craft is undermined. That threatens heritage. It is no different to whisky or Champagne. If Scotch must come from Scotland, then neon should mean glass and gas. This was about culture. Do we accept homogenised plastic across every street?

At Smithers, the stance is firm: real neon matters. The Commons was illuminated. The Act is still to come. But the case is stronger than ever. If Parliament can value neon, so should you. Reject plastic strips. Keep the glow alive.

When you loved this information and you would love to receive more information with regards to Urban Neon Co. please visit the web-site.

• 글쓰기

• 수정
• 삭제
• 목록