Parliament is not usually the stage for design debates. Tax and trade dominate the agenda. On a spring evening this year, the subject was neon. Labour’s Yasmin Qureshi, delivered a striking intervention. Her message was direct: hand-bent glass filled with noble gas is artistry. She warned against plastic imitations, arguing they dilute the name neon. Only gas-filled tubes deserve the title. Another Labour voice joined, speaking of local artists. The benches responded warmly.

Data told the story. The UK now counts fewer than thirty artisans. The pipeline of skills has closed. Without action, Britain could lose neon entirely. Qureshi proposed legal recognition, similar to Harris Tweed. Protect the name. Support also came from Jim Shannon, DUP, bringing a commercial lens. Reports show 7.5% annual growth. His point: heritage and commerce can co-exist. Chris Bryant concluded the session.

He teased the chamber with jokes, lightening the mood. Yet beyond the humour, he admitted neon’s value. He recalled iconic glows: Tracey Emin’s installations. He emphasised longevity. Why the debate? The issue is clarity. LED products are marketed as neon. That threatens heritage. Comparable to food and textile protections. If Scotch must come from Scotland, best neon lights then neon should mean glass and gas. This was about identity.

Do we allow heritage skills to disappear? We hold no doubt: real neon matters. Westminster glowed for a night. No law has passed yet. But the case is stronger than ever. If Parliament can value neon, so should you. Skip LED pretenders. Keep the glow alive.

If you cherished this article and you would like to be given more info relating to NeonCrafts Studio please visit our own internet site.

• 글쓰기

• 수정
• 삭제
• 목록