Start with domain experience, not the number of logos on the website. Ask for two or three engagements that sit close to your technology stack, and then find out which engineers actually built it. A solid partner will put you on a call with the engineers. Vague answers at this stage generally mean the demo work came from somewhere else.

The agreement deserves more attention than the sales deck. A few clauses carry most of the weight: assignment of intellectual property, mvp software development confidentiality, custom docker development and notice periods and handover. Every artifact has to transfer to you as it is paid for, including source code, designs and infrastructure as code. Be careful with any clause that leaves reusable components in the vendor's hands, as it is usually exactly the piece that locks you in.

Ask how they estimate. A credible estimate arrives with the assumptions behind it, a breakdown per feature and a range rather than a single number. A fixed-price contract is only reasonable when the scope is genuinely frozen; in any other case the supplier pads the number and you fund the buffer regardless. Hourly billing shifts that risk to you, so it requires a sprint cadence, demos and a budget cap.

The delivery process beats team size. Ask what happens when the scope changes, best java development company who writes the acceptance criteria and what the QA setup looks like. A well-run team will be able to demonstrate running software development agency rather than status reports. Written acceptance criteria remain the practical protection against the it-was-never-in-scope conversation.

Finally, plan for the day you no longer need this vendor at the start rather than at the end. Ask that the repository lives under your account from the beginning, and that documentation is written as you go rather than left to the end. A partner who is comfortable with this says yes immediately; a long negotiation over it says most of what you need to know.

• 글쓰기

• 수정
• 삭제
• 목록